Capital Structure quiz

When interest rates have fallen to low levels that are expected to persist, firms often increase their target proportion of debt to reflect its lower cost. Firms may issue equity when they perceive the market price of their stock to be temporarily high or repurchase their stock when they judge the price to be low.

Mature companies are able to support more debt than start-up companies or growth stage companies because they typically have predictable positive cash flows, lower business risk, and significant liquid assets .

A company’s optimal and target capital structures may be different from each other

Pecking order theory is based on information asymmetry and the resulting signals that different financing choices send to investors. It suggests that retained earnings are the first choice for financing an investment and issuing new equity is the least preferred choice.

The pecking order theory of capital structure assumes that firms have a preference ordering for capital sources. They prefer to use internally-generated equity first. When the internally-generated equity is exhausted, they issue new debt capital. As a last resort they will rely on externally-sourced equity. The reason that new equity is the last resort is that the issuance of new stock is assumed to send a negative signal to investors regarding firm value.

For companies entering the growth stage, revenue and cash flow are typically increasing. Both debt financing costs and business risk tend to be somewhat reduced compared to the start-up stage.

For a start-up company of this nature, debt financing is likely to be unattractive to lenders—and therefore very expensive or difficult to obtain. Debt financing is also unappealing to the company, because it commits the company to interest and principal payments that might be difficult to manage given the company’s uncertain cash flow outlook.

A firm should always finance a project based on the firm's weighted average cost of capital, although when evaluating a project, the firm may apply a risk factor to adjust the risk of the project. A corporate manager generally cannot deem some projects as being financed by debt and some by equity as all projects are effectively financed proportionately based on the firm's capital structure. In practice, a firm's actual capital structure will float around its target. For a firm that does have a target capital structure, the actual structure may vary from the target due to market value fluctuations, or management's desire to exploit an opportunity in a particular financing source.

If MM's other assumptions are maintained, removing the no tax assumption means that the value of the firm is maximized when the value of the tax shield is maximized, which occurs with a capital structure of 100% debt .

Management is advocating an acquisition that is likely to be positive for the value of the company’s options but negative for equityholders, given the substantial risk.

(Management believes the acquisition will be positive for shareholder value but negative for the value and interests of the company’s debtholders ) is an example of a debt-equity conflict.

(The acquisition is positive for equityholders and does not significantly impair the position of debtholders. However, the acquisition puts the company into a new business where labor practices are harsh and the production process is environmentally damaging ) is an example of stakeholder interests that are not being considered by management .

The static trade-off theory seeks to balance the costs of financial distress with the tax shield benefits from using debt. Under the static trade-off theory, there is an optimal capital structure that has an optimal proportion of debt that will maximize the value of the firm.

Stock dividends, like stock splits, have no impact on the value of a company’s equity. Issuing shares to acquire a competitor would increase equity relative to debt in the capital structure. Share price appreciation would also increase the market value of equity, thus increasing equity relative to debt .

The cost of equity rises with the use of debt in the capital structure (e.g., with increasing financial leverage) .

As cash flows become more predictable, the company is able to support more debt in its capital structure; the optimal capital structure includes a higher proportion of debt. While mature companies do borrow to support growth, this action would typically not occur because the company is optimizing its capital structure. Likewise, while a mature company might issue equity to finance growth, this action would not be the typical approach for a company optimizing its capital structure .

Companies generally raise capital when it is needed, such as for investment spending or when market pricing and terms are favorable for debt or equity issuance.

An electric utility has the capacity to support substantial debt, with very stable and predictable revenues and cash flows. The software company also has these attributes, but it would have been much less likely to have raised debt during its development and may have raised equity. The mining company has fixed assets, which it would have needed to finance, but the cyclical nature of its business would limit its debt capacity .

MM’s Proposition I (with no taxes) states that capital structure is irrelevant because the decrease in a firm’s WACC from additional debt financing is just offset by the increase in WACC from a decrease in equity financing. The cost of debt is held constant and the cost of equity financing increases as the proportion of debt in the capital structure is increased .

Share price changes will cause the market value of the company’s equity to change; book value is unaffected.

Statements A and B are accurate.